linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/9] ARM: at91/dt: add rm9200 spi0 chip select pins definitions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <528CDC75.1010404@overkiz.com>
Date:	Wed, 20 Nov 2013 16:59:49 +0100
From:	boris brezillon <b.brezillon@...rkiz.com>
To:	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
CC:	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	Joachim Eastwood <manabian@...il.com>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] ARM: at91/dt: add rm9200 spi0 chip select pins definitions

On 20/11/2013 15:56, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 13:02 Wed 28 Aug     , Boris BREZILLON wrote:
>> Add spi0 cs pinctrl pins definitions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon@...rkiz.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/at91rm9200.dtsi |   20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91rm9200.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91rm9200.dtsi
>> index f770655..69b76c7 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91rm9200.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91rm9200.dtsi
>> @@ -486,6 +486,26 @@
>>   							 AT91_PIOA 1 AT91_PERIPH_A AT91_PINCTRL_NONE	/* PA1 periph A SPI0_MOSI pin */
>>   							 AT91_PIOA 2 AT91_PERIPH_A AT91_PINCTRL_NONE>;	/* PA2 periph A SPI0_SPCK pin */
>>   					};
>> +
>> +					pinctrl_spi0_cs0: spi0_cs0-0 {
>> +						atmel,pins =
>> +							<AT91_PIOA 3 AT91_PERIPH_A AT91_PINCTRL_NONE>;	/* PA3 periph A SPI0_NPCS0 pin */
>> +					};
>> +
>> +					pinctrl_spi0_cs1: spi0_cs1-0 {
>> +						atmel,pins =
>> +							<AT91_PIOA 4 AT91_PERIPH_GPIO AT91_PINCTRL_MULTI_DRIVE>;	/* PA4 GPIO SPI0_NPCS1 pin */
>> +					};
>> +
>> +					pinctrl_spi0_cs2: spi0_cs2-0 {
>> +						atmel,pins =
>> +							<AT91_PIOA 5 AT91_PERIPH_GPIO AT91_PINCTRL_MULTI_DRIVE>;	/* PA5 GPIO SPI0_NPCS2 pin */
>> +					};
>> +
>> +					pinctrl_spi0_cs3: spi0_cs3-0 {
>> +						atmel,pins =
>> +							<AT91_PIOA 6 AT91_PERIPH_GPIO AT91_PINCTRL_MULTI_DRIVE>;	/* PA6 GPIO SPI0_NPCS3 pin */
>> +					};
> nack the pin are not multidrive there is only one master
Right, this is a mistake.

But the pins should be configured as OUTPUT with HIGH level
(see 
http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91rm9200_devices.c#L589).

>
> Best Regards,
> J.
>>   				};
>>   
>>   				pioA: gpio@...ff400 {
>> -- 
>> 1.7.9.5
>>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/