[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131121100722.GA25459@pd.tnic>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 11:07:22 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: Move fs.* to generic lib/lk/
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 08:34:10AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Ouch, the naming is horrible, what does 'lk' stand for?
"linux kernel" :-)
> Please rename it to something sensible before it spreads.
>
> libkernel.so and tools/lib/kernel/ would be perfect I think.
However, now that I think of it, the naming is kinda imprecise having
only "kernel" in it - it only denotes that it is a library of stuff that
has grown in the kernel.
So how about
tools/lib/ktools/
tools/lib/kutils/
tools/lib/kernel-tools/
tools/lib/kernel-utils/
...
and
libktools.so
libkutils.so
...
?
I'd prefer ktools as in the tools/ directory of the kernel repo.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists