[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131121111744.GA27513@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 12:17:44 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: Move fs.* to generic lib/lk/
* Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 08:34:10AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Ouch, the naming is horrible, what does 'lk' stand for?
>
> "linux kernel" :-)
>
> > Please rename it to something sensible before it spreads.
> >
> > libkernel.so and tools/lib/kernel/ would be perfect I think.
>
> However, now that I think of it, the naming is kinda imprecise
> having only "kernel" in it - it only denotes that it is a library of
> stuff that has grown in the kernel.
>
> So how about
>
> tools/lib/ktools/
> tools/lib/kutils/
> tools/lib/kernel-tools/
> tools/lib/kernel-utils/
> ...
>
> and
>
> libktools.so
> libkutils.so
> ...
>
> ?
>
> I'd prefer ktools as in the tools/ directory of the kernel repo.
So what does each name mean, what would they be used for and what's
the difference between them?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists