linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86, efi: add efi_whitelist_table to use all efi variable storage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1385142450.2884.1.camel@x230>
Date:	Fri, 22 Nov 2013 17:47:31 +0000
From:	Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>
To:	"isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com" <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
CC:	"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"matt.fleming@...el.com" <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
	"jlee@...e.com" <jlee@...e.com>,
	"matt@...sole-pimps.org" <matt@...sole-pimps.org>,
	"richard@....at" <richard@....at>,
	"cxie@...hat.com" <cxie@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, efi: add efi_whitelist_table to use all efi
 variable storage

On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 15:29 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:

> +			DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "FUJITSU"),
> +			DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "PRIMEQUEST"),

Can we guarantee that no Primequests have this issue? Can we guarantee
that that no prior firmware versions have this issue? Can we guarantee
that no future firmware versions will have this issue?

-- 
Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>