[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1385142514.2884.2.camel@x230>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 17:48:34 +0000
From: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>
To: "isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com" <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
CC: "linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"matt.fleming@...el.com" <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
"jlee@...e.com" <jlee@...e.com>,
"matt@...sole-pimps.org" <matt@...sole-pimps.org>,
"richard@....at" <richard@....at>,
"cxie@...hat.com" <cxie@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, efi: add no_bricked_efi whitelist
On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 15:23 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
> I don't know how to implement your idea. But if GC run by your idea, the free
> space may spread out. So 1) case is solved. But it does not solve 2) case.
> In my opinion, if system has sane firmware, all nvram strage should be used.
> I will send whiltelist version which used DMI infomation. Please review it.
We don't want to solve (2). The benefit in doing so is small compared to
the cost of maintaining a whitelist or risking breaking systems.
--
Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists