linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] checkpatch.pl: Check for functions without a real prototype

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1385160319.17856.35.camel@joe-AO722>
Date:	Fri, 22 Nov 2013 14:45:19 -0800
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Elena Ufimtseva <ufimtseva@...il.com>
Cc:	apw@...onical.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] checkpatch.pl: Check for functions without a real
 prototype

On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 17:17 -0500, Elena Ufimtseva wrote:
> Based on Richard Weinberger patch https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/16/510
> Functions like this one are evil:
> 
> void foo()
> {
> 	...
> }
[]
> - added white space in regular expression between (), based
> on comments from Joe Perches.

Thanks Elena, but this is already applied in -next.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/