linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] checkpatch.pl: Check for functions without a real prototype

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 22 Nov 2013 17:48:09 -0500
From:	Elena Ufimtseva <ufimtseva@...il.com>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	apw <apw@...onical.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] checkpatch.pl: Check for functions without a real prototype

On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 17:17 -0500, Elena Ufimtseva wrote:
>> Based on Richard Weinberger patch https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/16/510
>> Functions like this one are evil:
>>
>> void foo()
>> {
>>       ...
>> }
> []
>> - added white space in regular expression between (), based
>> on comments from Joe Perches.
>
> Thanks Elena, but this is already applied in -next.
>
>
No problem, thanks Joe )

-- 
Elena
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/