linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] net: sctp: set chunk->tsn_gap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <529065B3.6060905@gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 23 Nov 2013 09:22:11 +0100
From:	Chang <changxiangzhong@...il.com>
To:	Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>, nhorman@...driver.com,
	davem@...emloft.net
CC:	linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: sctp: set chunk->tsn_gap_acked at the end of cycle


On 11/22/2013 11:48 PM, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> On 11/22/2013 02:24 PM, Chang wrote:
>> On 11/22/2013 03:27 PM, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
>>> On 11/22/2013 02:49 AM, Chang Xiangzhong wrote:
>>>> tsn_gap_acked is an important state flag in chunk, which indicates if
>>>> the
>>>> chunk has been acked in gap reports before.
>>> Actually, this bit indicates simply that the chunk has been acked.  It
>>> doesn't state whether it's been acked in a gap report or via
>>> cumulative tsn.
>> Thanks for pointing this out. Sorry for not having made that clear.
>>>> SFR-CACC algorithm depends on this
>>>> variable. So set this at the end of each iteration, otherwise the
>>>> SFR-CACC
>>>> algorithm would never be toggled.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Chang Xiangzhong <changxiangzhong@...il.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    net/sctp/outqueue.c | 3 ++-
>>>>    1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/net/sctp/outqueue.c b/net/sctp/outqueue.c
>>>> index 1b494fa..bff828c 100644
>>>> --- a/net/sctp/outqueue.c
>>>> +++ b/net/sctp/outqueue.c
>>>> @@ -1396,7 +1396,6 @@ static void sctp_check_transmitted(struct
>>>> sctp_outq *q,
>>>>                 * while DATA was outstanding).
>>>>                 */
>>>>                if (!tchunk->tsn_gap_acked) {
>>>> -                tchunk->tsn_gap_acked = 1;
>>>>                    if (TSN_lt(*highest_new_tsn_in_sack, tsn))
>>>>                        *highest_new_tsn_in_sack = tsn;
>>>>                    bytes_acked += sctp_data_size(tchunk);
>>>> @@ -1460,6 +1459,8 @@ static void sctp_check_transmitted(struct
>>>> sctp_outq *q,
>>>>                     */
>>>>                    list_add_tail(lchunk, &tlist);
>>>>                }
>>>> +
>>>> +            tchunk->tsn_gap_acked = 1;
>>> The current code will set the state if it hasn't been set yet.  Why is
>>> this needed?
>> Because in line 1420 ~ 1440 The SFR-CACC algorithms use tsn_gap_acked.
>> That "if block" would never be triggered because the varaiable's been
>> set. That's why I move the "state changing sentence" to the end of the
>> iteration.
>>> Now there is an issue with tracking highest_new_tsn_in_sack.  The spec
>>> is a little vague on this, but the highest_new_tsn_in_sack only supposed
>>> to track tsns that have not been resent.  If a tsn has been reneged, and
>>> then sent again, it is not considered 'new' thus should not count
>>> toward highest_new_tsn_in_sack.  We currently do not track this right.
>> I'll try to figure this out.
> So the solution that's been proposed before is to move the CACC block up
> and merge it with the !tsn_gap_acked block.  This requires additional
> change though to only mark highest_new_tsn if the chunk has not been
> retransmitted (which you've added in a prior patch).
>
> -vlad
Yeah, I've mixed that up with a prior patch. How was the previous patch? 
Was it approved?
-chang
>>> -vlad
>>>
>>> -vlad
>>>
>>>>            } else {
>>>>                if (tchunk->tsn_gap_acked) {
>>>>                    pr_debug("%s: receiver reneged on data TSN:0x%x\n",
>>>>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/