[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131123032708.02a47303@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 03:27:08 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/22] tools lib traceevent: Add
traceevent_host_bigendian function
On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 23:22:52 +0900
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
> 2013-11-21 (목), 12:01 +0100, Jiri Olsa:
> > Adding traceevent_host_bigendian function to get host
> > endianity. It's used in following patches.
>
> [SNIP]
> > +static inline int traceevent_host_bigendian(void)
> > +{
> > + unsigned char str[] = { 0x1, 0x2, 0x3, 0x4 };
> > + unsigned int *ptr;
> > +
> > + ptr = (unsigned int *)str;
> > + return *ptr == 0x01020304;
>
> Is it safe for every architecture supported - especially ones that
> require stricter alignment? I know many architectures/compilers align
> stack but not sure doing this is safe for all architecture.
Would you prefer this (I tested it on both a big and little endian)
{
unsigned char str[] = { 0x1, 0x2, 0x3, 0x4 };
unsigned int val;
memcpy(&val, str, 4);
return val == 0x01020304;
}
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists