[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131124002254.265c2d28@alan.etchedpixels.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 00:22:54 +0000
From: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH tty-next 5/7] n_tty: Refactor input_available_p() by
call site
On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 10:59:23 -0500
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com> wrote:
> Distinguish if caller is n_tty_poll() or n_tty_read(), and
> set the read/wakeup threshold accordingly.
That looks very wrong to me. The poll() and read() wakeup should always
match. In addition if MIN_CHAR is set without a timeout then it should not
wake up until MIN_CHAR characters are present. The MIN_CHAR feature is
used by various (these days obscure) protocols to optimise block transfer
rates.
Changing this is also a userspace visible API change.
So NAK.
The underlying intention of the system (and SYS5.4) is that you can do
MIN_CHAR = 64
alarm(some_timeout)
while(1) {
poll();
events
read(chunksized blocks)
}
while it's hardly as critical with modern fast hardware its still the API
and necessary to avoid SWS type behaviours in the queue turning it from
block/syscall to byte I/O.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists