[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131124002324.2fe609d6@alan.etchedpixels.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 00:23:24 +0000
From: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH tty-next 6/7] n_tty: Only perform wakeups for waiters
On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 10:59:24 -0500
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com> wrote:
> Only wakeup the _waiting_ reader, polls and/or writer(s).
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
> ---
> drivers/tty/n_tty.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/n_tty.c b/drivers/tty/n_tty.c
> index 8f2356e..aae28a6 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/n_tty.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/n_tty.c
> @@ -275,7 +275,8 @@ static void n_tty_check_unthrottle(struct tty_struct *tty)
> return;
> n_tty_set_room(tty);
> n_tty_write_wakeup(tty->link);
> - wake_up_interruptible_poll(&tty->link->write_wait, POLLOUT);
> + if (waitqueue_active(&tty->link->write_wait))
> + wake_up_interruptible_poll(&tty->link->write_wait, POLLOUT);
Does this actually microbenchmark faster ?
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists