lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <5293141E.5090202@Wilocity.com>
Date:	Mon, 25 Nov 2013 11:10:54 +0200
From:	Anton Nayshtut <Anton.Nayshtut@...ocity.com>
To:	Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...hat.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>,
	Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>,
	Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
	Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@...ebox.fr>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Erez Kirshenbaum <Erez.Kirshenbaum@...ocity.com>,
	Boris Lapshin <Boris.Lapshin@...ocity.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] bonding: L2DA mode added

Eric, Nik, Andy,

Thanks for your comments.

I'll investigate the override option approach first, and then will
re-implement the patch using RCU with corresponding
Documentation/networking/bonding.txt changes, if still needed.

P.S. Sorry for delay with my reply. It was caused by personal reasons.

Best Regards,
Anton

On 21/11/2013 17:37, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> On 11/21/2013 04:32 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> On Thu, 2013-11-21 at 16:55 +0200, Anton Nayshtut wrote:
>>> This patches introduces L2DA bonding module with all the data structures and
>>> interfaces. It's not integrated yet.
>>
>> I veto any kind of new bonding mode not using RCU.
>>
>> Adding another rwlock in 2013 is simply not an option.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
> +1
> Also,
> I haven't read the patch-set closely but based on the description in the first
> patch I think you can already get this (or very similar) functionality by using
> the slave override option in the bonding. You can match the destination L2
> address and override the slave based on that.
> 
> Nik
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ