[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131125101825.GT2281@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 12:18:25 +0200
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: Alex Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Rhyland Klein <rklein@...dia.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] gpio / ACPI: get rid of acpi_gpio.h
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 05:51:00PM +0900, Alex Courbot wrote:
> I just wondered if these headers should not be split by GPIO
> providers, but if you prefer it that way I'm fine with it too. We
> can move stuff later if needed.
>
> Acked-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
Thanks!
BTW, I noticed that I missed removing EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() from
acpi_get_gpiod_by_index(). I'm folding that change to this patch for the
next version if nobody objects.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists