linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv2] perf tools: Fix tags/TAGS targets rebuilding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 26 Nov 2013 17:13:16 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] perf tools: Fix tags/TAGS targets rebuilding


* Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 01:00:55PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:31:08PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> SNIP
> 
> > > > 
> > > > Also note that we have duplicate code for this in Makefile.perf 
> > > > already. Would it be possible to pass through this there and keep the 
> > > > main Makefile is just a thin, minimal wrapper that adds default 
> > > > parallelism, etc?
> > > 
> > > well, thats what I actually tried to do.. pass the
> > > processing to the Makefile.perf otherwise it stops
> > > in Makefile
> > > 
> > > I guess you want some generic way of doing that
> > 
> > If it's just these two phony targets that need to be in the main 
> > makefile then I guess your approach is the simplest one and we should 
> > do it like that instead of complicating the interface. If it gets 
> > messier in the future we can reconsider?
> > 
> 
> sounds good, pelase check v2
> 
> thanks,
> jirka
> 
> 
> ---
> Once the tags/TAGS file is generated it's never rebuilt
> until it's removed by hand.
> 
> The reason is that the Makefile does not treat tags/TAGS
> as targets but as files and thus won't rebuilt them
> once they are in place.
> 
> Adding PHONY tags/TAGS targets into Makefile.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
> Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/Makefile | 7 ++++++-
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/Makefile b/tools/perf/Makefile
> index 4835618..eefb9fb 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/perf/Makefile
> @@ -60,8 +60,11 @@ endef
>  
>  #
>  # Needed if no target specified:
> +# (Except for tags and TAGS targets. The reason is that the
> +# Makefile does not treat tags/TAGS as targets but as files
> +# and thus won't rebuilt them once they are in place.)

s/rebuilt/rebuild

Btw., could we perhaps change the targets to 'ctags' and 'etags' 
instead? (That will make it natural to add 'gtags' in the future, 
should anyone want that.)

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/