[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131126164552.GF2959@phenom.dumpdata.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 11:45:52 -0500
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
Cc: Ian.Campbell@...rix.com, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, JBeulich@...e.com,
boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] xen/manage: Guard against user-space initiated
poweroff and XenBus.
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:09:52AM +0000, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 08/11/13 17:38, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > There is a race case where the user does 'poweroff'
> > and at the same time the system admin does 'xl shutdown'.
>
> This isn't a Xen-specific problem is it? Wouldn't it be better to fix
> this in generic code?
Possibly. I believe the reason for the reboot_notifier to exist is
to provide a means to fix the race.
>
> Especially since I don't think this patch actually fixes the race
> completely.
>
> > --- a/drivers/xen/manage.c
> > +++ b/drivers/xen/manage.c
> [...]
> > @@ -222,7 +230,7 @@ static void shutdown_handler(struct xenbus_watch *watch,
> > };
> > static struct shutdown_handler *handler;
> >
> > - if (shutting_down != SHUTDOWN_INVALID)
> > + if (atomic_read(&shutting_down) != SHUTDOWN_INVALID)
> > return;
>
> In guest initiated poweroff at this time will still race with this
> toolstack initiated poweroff.
No, b/c the reboot notifier would have set 'shutting_down' already.
>
> David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists