linux-kernel - Re: [Devel] [PATCH v11 00/15] kmemcg shrinkers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20131126084644.405a091d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 26 Nov 2013 08:46:44 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
Cc:	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <glommer@...nvz.org>,
	<mhocko@...e.cz>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
	<devel@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [Devel] [PATCH v11 00/15] kmemcg shrinkers

On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 16:55:43 +0400 Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com> wrote:

> What do you think about splitting this set into two main series as follows:
> 
> 1) Prepare vmscan to kmemcg-aware shrinkers; would include patches 1-7 
> of this set.
> 2) Make fs shrinkers memcg-aware; would include patches 9-11 of this set

Please just resend everything.

> and leave other patches, which are rather for optimization/extending 
> functionality, for future?

It will be helpful to describe such splitting opportunities in the
[0/n] changelog.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/