| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-id: <003101ceebfe$bab50890$301f19b0$@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 13:56:43 +0800
From: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@...sung.com>
To: jaegeuk.kim@...sung.com
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
'谭姝' <shu.tan@...sung.com>
Subject: RE: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: readahead contiguous pages for
restore_node_summary
Hi,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk.kim@...sung.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2013 11:33 AM
> To: Chao Yu
> Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net; '谭姝'
> Subject: RE: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: readahead contiguous pages for restore_node_summary
>
> Hi,
>
> 2013-11-28 (목), 09:26 +0800, Chao Yu:
> > Hi Kim,
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk.kim@...sung.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 4:19 PM
> > > To: Chao Yu
> > > Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net; '谭姝'
> > > Subject: RE: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: readahead contiguous pages for restore_node_summary
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > 2013-11-27 (수), 15:58 +0800, Chao Yu:
> > > > Hi Kim,
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk.kim@...sung.com]
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 1:30 PM
> > > > > To: Chao Yu
> > > > > Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net; 谭姝
> > > > > Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: readahead contiguous pages for restore_node_summary
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Chao,
> > > > >
> > > > > It seems that we already have a readahed function for node pages,
> > > > > ra_node_page().
> > > > > So, we don't make a page list for this, but can use the node_inode's
> > > > > page cache.
> > > >
> > > > So you mean it's waste to release page list with updated data after we
> > > > finish work in restore_node_summary, right?
> > >
> > > Right.
> >
> > So how about add all pages of page list to node_inode's address space by
> > add_to_page_cache_lru() with arg sum_entry->nid?
>
> I don't think it's proper way to use add_to_page_cache_lru() directly.
This is the way used in VM readahead(i.e. read_pages/mpage_readpages/
read_cache_pages).
So what you worry about is that using lonely add_to_page_cache_lru()
may cause exception, is it?
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > So how about writing ra_node_pages() which use the node_inode's page
> > > > > cache?
> > > >
> > > > Hmm, so ra_node_pages is introduced for read node_inode's pages which are
> > > > logical contiguously? and it also could take place of ra_node_page?
> > >
> > > Ah. The ra_node_page() read a node page ahead for a given node id.
> > > So it doesn't match exactly between ra_node_page() and ra_node_pages()
> > > that I suggested.
> > > So how about reading node pages and then caching some of them in the
> > > page cache, node_inode's address space?
> >
> > Got it,
> > If we do not use the method above, we should search the NAT for nid number
> > as the index of node_inode's page by the specified node page blkaddr, that costs
> > a lot.
> > How do you think?
>
> 1. grab_cache_page(node_footer->nid);
> 2. memcpy();
> 3. SetPageUptodate();
> 4. f2fs_put_page();
It could be.
This make ra_node_pages() synchronized, because we should read node_footer->nid
from updated node page before we cache node pages, and we will still use page list to
pass the updated page.
Why not introduce f2fs_cache_node_pages() include your code to cache node pages after
ra_node_pages()?
Thanks,
Yu
>
> Thanks,
>
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > 2013-11-22 (금), 15:48 +0800, Chao Yu:
> > > > > > If cp has no CP_UMOUNT_FLAG, we will read all pages in whole node segment
> > > > > > one by one, it makes low performance. So let's merge contiguous pages and
> > > > > > readahead for better performance.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@...sung.com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > fs/f2fs/node.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> > > > > > 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > > > > > index 4ac4150..81e704a 100644
> > > > > > --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > > > > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > > > > > @@ -1572,47 +1572,84 @@ int recover_inode_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct page *page)
> > > > > > return 0;
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +/*
> > > > > > + * ra_sum_pages() merge contiguous pages into one bio and submit.
> > > > > > + * these pre-readed pages are linked in pages list.
> > > > > > + */
> > > > > > +static int ra_sum_pages(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct list_head *pages,
> > > > > > + int start, int nrpages)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + struct page *page;
> > > > > > + int page_idx = start;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + for (; page_idx < start + nrpages; page_idx++) {
> > > > > > + /* alloc temporal page for read node summary info*/
> > > > > > + page = alloc_page(GFP_NOFS | __GFP_ZERO);
> > > > > > + if (!page) {
> > > > > > + struct page *tmp;
> > > > > > + list_for_each_entry_safe(page, tmp, pages, lru) {
> > > > > > + list_del(&page->lru);
> > > > > > + unlock_page(page);
> > > > > > + __free_pages(page, 0);
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + lock_page(page);
> > > > > > + page->index = page_idx;
> > > > > > + list_add_tail(&page->lru, pages);
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + list_for_each_entry(page, pages, lru)
> > > > > > + submit_read_page(sbi, page, page->index, READ_SYNC);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + f2fs_submit_read_bio(sbi, READ_SYNC);
> > > > > > + return 0;
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > int restore_node_summary(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > > > > > unsigned int segno, struct f2fs_summary_block *sum)
> > > > > > {
> > > > > > struct f2fs_node *rn;
> > > > > > struct f2fs_summary *sum_entry;
> > > > > > - struct page *page;
> > > > > > + struct page *page, *tmp;
> > > > > > block_t addr;
> > > > > > - int i, last_offset;
> > > > > > -
> > > > > > - /* alloc temporal page for read node */
> > > > > > - page = alloc_page(GFP_NOFS | __GFP_ZERO);
> > > > > > - if (!page)
> > > > > > - return -ENOMEM;
> > > > > > - lock_page(page);
> > > > > > + int bio_blocks = MAX_BIO_BLOCKS(max_hw_blocks(sbi));
> > > > > > + int i, last_offset, nrpages, err = 0;
> > > > > > + LIST_HEAD(page_list);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > /* scan the node segment */
> > > > > > last_offset = sbi->blocks_per_seg;
> > > > > > addr = START_BLOCK(sbi, segno);
> > > > > > sum_entry = &sum->entries[0];
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - for (i = 0; i < last_offset; i++, sum_entry++) {
> > > > > > - /*
> > > > > > - * In order to read next node page,
> > > > > > - * we must clear PageUptodate flag.
> > > > > > - */
> > > > > > - ClearPageUptodate(page);
> > > > > > + for (i = 0; i < last_offset; i += nrpages, addr += nrpages) {
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - if (f2fs_readpage(sbi, page, addr, READ_SYNC))
> > > > > > - goto out;
> > > > > > + nrpages = min(last_offset - i, bio_blocks);
> > > > > > + /* read ahead node pages */
> > > > > > + err = ra_sum_pages(sbi, &page_list, addr, nrpages);
> > > > > > + if (err)
> > > > > > + return err;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - lock_page(page);
> > > > > > - rn = F2FS_NODE(page);
> > > > > > - sum_entry->nid = rn->footer.nid;
> > > > > > - sum_entry->version = 0;
> > > > > > - sum_entry->ofs_in_node = 0;
> > > > > > - addr++;
> > > > > > + list_for_each_entry_safe(page, tmp, &page_list, lru) {
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + lock_page(page);
> > > > > > + if(PageUptodate(page)) {
> > > > > > + rn = F2FS_NODE(page);
> > > > > > + sum_entry->nid = rn->footer.nid;
> > > > > > + sum_entry->version = 0;
> > > > > > + sum_entry->ofs_in_node = 0;
> > > > > > + sum_entry++;
> > > > > > + } else {
> > > > > > + err = -EIO;
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + list_del(&page->lru);
> > > > > > + unlock_page(page);
> > > > > > + __free_pages(page, 0);
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > }
> > > > > > - unlock_page(page);
> > > > > > -out:
> > > > > > - __free_pages(page, 0);
> > > > > > - return 0;
> > > > > > + return err;
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > static bool flush_nats_in_journal(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Jaegeuk Kim
> > > > > Samsung
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jaegeuk Kim
> > > Samsung
> >
>
> --
> Jaegeuk Kim
> Samsung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists