lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFLxGvykU+KZg9q1pq68_p+2gfg+5auABX34df88qAF9v0vzMw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 28 Nov 2013 18:17:02 +0100
From:	Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
To:	Peng Tao <lkml.bergwolf@...il.com>
Cc:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: How to create a config that doesn't set CONFIG_PROC_FS

On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Peng Tao <lkml.bergwolf@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Peng Tao <lkml.bergwolf@...il.com> wrote:
>>> Even if I use `make allnoconfig`, CONFIG_PROC_FS is still set. So I'm
>>> wondering how to create a config without CONFIG_PROC_FS for build
>>> testing?
>>
>> It can be disabled only if CONFIG_EXPERT=y.
> Cool. Thank you very much!

Out of curiosity, for which use case do you need that?
Is is possible to run a sane userspace without procfs?

-- 
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ