lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 01:37:30 +0800 From: Peng Tao <lkml.bergwolf@...il.com> To: Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: How to create a config that doesn't set CONFIG_PROC_FS On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:17 AM, Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Peng Tao <lkml.bergwolf@...il.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven >> <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote: >>> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Peng Tao <lkml.bergwolf@...il.com> wrote: >>>> Even if I use `make allnoconfig`, CONFIG_PROC_FS is still set. So I'm >>>> wondering how to create a config without CONFIG_PROC_FS for build >>>> testing? >>> >>> It can be disabled only if CONFIG_EXPERT=y. >> Cool. Thank you very much! > > Out of curiosity, for which use case do you need that? > Is is possible to run a sane userspace without procfs? > To be frank, I don't know. I just got build failure reports to fix up when CONFIG_PROC_FS is off... Thanks, Tao -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists