[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131129205628.GA20144@pd.tnic>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 21:56:28 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Levente Kurusa <levex@...ux.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
EDAC <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: mcheck: call put_device on device_register failure
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 09:28:48PM +0100, Levente Kurusa wrote:
> This patch adds a call to put_device() when the device_register()
> call has failed. This is required so that the last reference to the
> device is given up.
I'd assume this is not something you're actually hitting but have caught
this by code staring...?
> Signed-off-by: Levente Kurusa <levex@...ux.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> index b3218cd..a389c1d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> @@ -2272,8 +2272,10 @@ static int mce_device_create(unsigned int cpu)
> dev->release = &mce_device_release;
>
> err = device_register(dev);
> - if (err)
> + if (err) {
> + put_device(dev);
> return err;
> + }
If we're going to do this, I'd also like to see you add another label
after device_unregister(dev) which also kfrees dev because apparently
we're not doing that either.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists