[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52999419.7040600@linux.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 08:30:33 +0100
From: Levente Kurusa <levex@...ux.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
EDAC <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: mcheck: call put_device on device_register failure
2013-11-29 21:56, Borislav Petkov:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 09:28:48PM +0100, Levente Kurusa wrote:
>> This patch adds a call to put_device() when the device_register()
>> call has failed. This is required so that the last reference to the
>> device is given up.
>
> I'd assume this is not something you're actually hitting but have caught
> this by code staring...?
>
Yup, I have been staring at it.
> If we're going to do this, I'd also like to see you add another label
> after device_unregister(dev) which also kfrees dev because apparently
> we're not doing that either.
>
No, if the call to put_device gives up the last reference to the device,
then device_release gets called which in turn frees the memory associated with it.
In this case, mce_device_release() will get called, which is just a simple kfree call.
--
Regards,
Levente Kurusa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists