[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131130111214.GB4323@pd.tnic>
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 12:12:14 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Levente Kurusa <levex@...ux.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
EDAC <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: mcheck: call put_device on device_register failure
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 08:30:33AM +0100, Levente Kurusa wrote:
> No, if the call to put_device gives up the last reference to the
> device, then device_release gets called which in turn frees the memory
> associated with it. In this case, mce_device_release() will get
> called, which is just a simple kfree call.
Aah, that's that delayed freeing the driver core does, right. Now you
made me go and look into detail:
device_unregister
|->put_device
|->kobject_put
|->kref_put(&kobj->kref, kobject_release)
|->kref_sub(kref, 1, release)
|->release
|->kobject_release
|->kobject_cleanup
|->t->release
|->device_release
|->mce_device_release
Ok, I see it now. :-) :-)
Thanks, I'll take your patch as-is.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists