[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20131202145258.9f14767c1190c068becece0d@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 14:52:58 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] mm/rmap: make rmap_walk to get the
rmap_walk_control argument
On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 16:48:41 +0900 Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com> wrote:
> In each rmap traverse case, there is some difference so that we need
> function pointers and arguments to them in order to handle these
> difference properly.
>
> For this purpose, struct rmap_walk_control is introduced in this patch,
> and will be extended in following patch. Introducing and extending are
> separate, because it clarify changes.
>
> --- a/mm/migrate.c
> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
> @@ -198,7 +198,12 @@ out:
> */
> static void remove_migration_ptes(struct page *old, struct page *new)
> {
> - rmap_walk(new, remove_migration_pte, old);
> + struct rmap_walk_control rwc;
> +
> + memset(&rwc, 0, sizeof(rwc));
> + rwc.main = remove_migration_pte;
> + rwc.arg = old;
> + rmap_walk(new, &rwc);
> }
It is much neater to do
struct rmap_walk_control rwc = {
.main = remove_migration_pte,
.arg = old,
};
which will zero out all remaining fields as well.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists