linux-kernel - Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 07/10] ASoC: ux500: Store DMA data in the DAI differently in the pdata and DT case

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131202135452.GI27568@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 2 Dec 2013 13:54:52 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	LinusW <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 07/10] ASoC: ux500: Store DMA data in the
 DAI differently in the pdata and DT case

On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 10:12:56AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:

> It's actually my fault. I had two patches round the wrong way in the
> series. The imediately subsequent patch in the set fixes this issue:

OK, so what do we do about this?  Is there going to be a revision of
that patch adding the note about not using the autoconfiguration stuff
and what (if any) are the dependencies on the arch/arm changes?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)