[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131202140324.GH31626@lee--X1>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 14:03:24 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
LinusW <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 07/10] ASoC: ux500: Store DMA data in the
DAI differently in the pdata and DT case
On Mon, 02 Dec 2013, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 10:12:56AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > It's actually my fault. I had two patches round the wrong way in the
> > series. The imediately subsequent patch in the set fixes this issue:
>
> OK, so what do we do about this? Is there going to be a revision of
> that patch adding the note about not using the autoconfiguration stuff
> and what (if any) are the dependencies on the arch/arm changes?
I can shoot out a revision no problem.
I'm not aware of any dependencies on the ARM changes. I haven't tested
the arch/arm and sound/soc adaptions orthogonally, but I _think_ the
right decisions should be made depending on the information passed
from platform/dt code.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists