linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] dynticks updates for 3.13

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131202143927.GB6758@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Mon, 2 Dec 2013 15:39:34 +0100
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] dynticks updates for 3.13

On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 03:11:06PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > * Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Ingo,
> > > 
> > > Please pull the timers/core branch that can be found at:
> > > 
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/linux-dynticks.git
> > > 	timers/core
> > > 
> > > It passed through 0-day testing. I'm proposing it for 3.13 just in case but I'm ok
> > > as well if you think it's too late and should be delayed for 3.14
> > 
> > Pulled into tip:timers/core, thanks Frederic!
> 
> Hm, I had to unpull it due to build failure:
> 
>   kernel/time/tick-sched.c:1054:2: error: too few arguments to function ‘tick_check_nohz’

Aie! I realize now that Wu Fengguang's 0-day testing reported me this on the 1st version
of this patchset. Then I got distracted with other things and forgot to fix it. And it didn't
warn me on the 2nd take to avoid spamming me.

Anyway, I'll fix this and resend.

> 
> I guess this means that it's better to rebase this series - at which 
> point the other complaints I had could be addressed as well?

Yeah sure.

Thanks!

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/