[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131202144759.GA6949@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 15:48:01 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] dynticks updates for 3.13
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 02:59:07PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > Ingo,
> >
> > Please pull the timers/core branch that can be found at:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/linux-dynticks.git
> > timers/core
> >
> > It passed through 0-day testing. I'm proposing it for 3.13 just in case but I'm ok
> > as well if you think it's too late and should be delayed for 3.14
>
> Pulled into tip:timers/core, thanks Frederic!
>
> In the future it would be nice to write a higher level description
> that I can put into the merge commit. I wrote this:
>
> Pull dynticks updates from Frederic Weisbecker: smaller fixes and
> cleanups.
Right, I'll add more detailed summary next times.
>
> Btw., how does the bug here:
>
> 92e73cf831ba posix-timers: Fix full dynticks CPUs kick on timer rescheduling
>
> manifest itself to users? Is there any real bug, or suboptimal nohz
> behavior? (more wakeups than expected) This kind of information should
> really be in the changelog.
Agreed, it fixes a real bug and that's missing from the changelog, I'll make it
clearer on the next take.
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Frederic
> > ---
> >
> > Frederic Weisbecker (5):
> > nohz: Convert a few places to use local per cpu accesses
> > context_tracking: Wrap static key check into more intuitive function name
> > context_tracking: Rename context_tracking_active() to context_tracking_cpu_is_enabled()
> > posix-timers: Spare workqueue if there is no full dynticks CPU to kick
> > posix-timers: Fix full dynticks CPUs kick on timer rescheduling
> >
> > Paul Gortmaker (1):
> > trivial: fix spelling in CONTEXT_TRACKING_FORCE help text
> >
> >
> > include/linux/context_tracking.h | 10 ++++-----
> > include/linux/context_tracking_state.h | 11 +++++++---
> > include/linux/tick.h | 8 ++++----
> > include/linux/vtime.h | 4 ++--
> > init/Kconfig | 2 +-
> > kernel/context_tracking.c | 8 ++++----
> > kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c | 21 +++++++++----------
> > kernel/softirq.c | 4 +---
> > kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c | 6 +++---
> > kernel/time/tick-internal.h | 4 ++--
> > kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 37 ++++++++++++++--------------------
> > 11 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
>
> Btw., I noticed one other detail:
>
> - tick_check_oneshot_broadcast(cpu);
> - tick_check_nohz(cpu);
> + tick_check_oneshot_broadcast();
> + tick_check_nohz();
>
> it would be nice to name such functions that lose a 'cpu' argument
> with the this_cpu pattern, i.e.:
>
> - tick_check_oneshot_broadcast_this_cpu()
Hmm, that's going to be quite a long name. But I'm ok with the whole idea, so
I'll handle that too.
> - tick_check_nohz_this_cpu()
>
> This makes it more obvious at a glance that they have 'current CPU'
> assumptions in them
Ok, thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists