linux-kernel - Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: ux500_pcm: Differentiate between pdata and DT initialisation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 03 Dec 2013 12:55:42 +0100
From:	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	broonie@...nel.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
	alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: ux500_pcm: Differentiate between
 pdata and DT initialisation

On 12/03/2013 11:27 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> If booting with full DT support (i.e. DMA too, the last piece of the
> puzzle), then we don't need to use the compatible_request_channel call
> back or require some of the historical bumph which probably isn't
> required by a platform data start-up now either. This will also be
> ripped out in upcoming commits.
> 
> Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>

Strictly speaking you do not need the second config, but well considering
that this will all hopefully be removed soon anyway it should be fine.

Reviewed-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/