[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131203120420.GC12031@lee--X1>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 12:04:20 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
broonie@...nel.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: ux500_pcm: Differentiate between
pdata and DT initialisation
On Tue, 03 Dec 2013, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 12/03/2013 11:27 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > If booting with full DT support (i.e. DMA too, the last piece of the
> > puzzle), then we don't need to use the compatible_request_channel call
> > back or require some of the historical bumph which probably isn't
> > required by a platform data start-up now either. This will also be
> > ripped out in upcoming commits.
> >
> > Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org
> > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
>
> Strictly speaking you do not need the second config, but well considering
> that this will all hopefully be removed soon anyway it should be fine.
That's true it will, but why don't we need the second config? I won't
want the compat function to be called in the DT case.
> Reviewed-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
Thanks.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists