[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <529DF897.1080303@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 15:28:23 +0000
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@...aro.org>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
CC: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@...rix.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
patches@...aro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/block: Correctly define structures in
public headers on ARM32 and ARM64
On 12/03/2013 03:15 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 03.12.13 at 16:09, Julien Grall <julien.grall@...aro.org> wrote:
>> --- a/include/xen/interface/io/blkif.h
>> +++ b/include/xen/interface/io/blkif.h
>> @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ struct blkif_request_segment_aligned {
>> struct blkif_request_rw {
>> uint8_t nr_segments; /* number of segments */
>> blkif_vdev_t handle; /* only for read/write requests */
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_X86_64) || defined(CONFIG_ARM) || defined(CONFIG_ARM64)
>
> Perhaps using
>
> #ifndef CONFIG_X86_32
>
> would be the better one, assuming that we won't add further
> non-64-bit-clean ABI variants?
I'm fine with this solution. I will resend the patch.
--
Julien Grall
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists