[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131203024726.GC23997@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 18:47:26 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Rui Xiang <rui.xiang@...wei.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysfs: add necessary Null check in
sysfs_do_create_link_sd
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 09:38:47AM +0800, Rui Xiang wrote:
> While target_sd or sd are null, it won't need sysfs_put and
> should return -ENOENT directly. Here add null check for
> target_sd and sd.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rui Xiang <rui.xiang@...wei.com>
> ---
> fs/sysfs/symlink.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/sysfs/symlink.c b/fs/sysfs/symlink.c
> index 3ae3f1b..d69b786 100644
> --- a/fs/sysfs/symlink.c
> +++ b/fs/sysfs/symlink.c
> @@ -83,8 +83,10 @@ static int sysfs_do_create_link_sd(struct sysfs_dirent *parent_sd,
> return 0;
>
> out_put:
> - sysfs_put(target_sd);
> - sysfs_put(sd);
> + if (target_sd)
> + sysfs_put(target_sd);
> + if (sd)
> + sysfs_put(sd);
This change does nothing at all, why is it needed?
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists