[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALkWK0m_W0c7AhCOZmMObq2MUjL83jL+YsM-qUmXz8j0MOFLiw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 18:41:18 +0530
From: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@...il.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] perf diff: color the Ratio column
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> The issue with this suggestion is that the prototype of
>> percent_color_snprintf() is:
>>
>> int percent_color_snprintf(char *bf, size_t size, const char *fmt, ...)
>>
>> So, I can only pass value_color_snprintf() a va_list, making its prototype:
>>
>> int value_color_snprintf(char *bf, size_t size, const char *fmt, va_list args)
>>
>> Is this worth the minor rename?
>
> That is ok, I'd say. Or if that would be a problem one could consider
> using a macro, perhaps.
If value_color_snprintf has the prototype mentioned above, I'd have to
build a va_list at each callsite; how is that convenient? Considering
the macro, can we just do
#define percent_color_snprintf value_color_snprintf
in color.h?
>> On a related note, does percent_color_snprintf() need to be a variadic
>> function? It only seems to process one percent value.
>
> I think that there are places where it is passed as a pointer that
> expects it to have that prototype, this is from memory, so please check.
I meant that the function body itself seems to be wrong:
va_start(args, fmt);
percent = va_arg(args, double);
va_end(args);
color = get_percent_color(percent);
return color_snprintf(bf, size, color, fmt, percent);
Unless I've misunderstood something horribly, doesn't `percent' just
get assigned to the last argument in the `args' va_list?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists