lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 4 Dec 2013 16:38:45 +0000
From:	James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>
To:	Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
	<linux-metag@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Jiri Kosina <trivial@...nel.org>,
	Wang YanQing <udknight@...il.com>, <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 10/19] smp, metag: kill SMP single function call
 interrupt

On 04/12/13 16:13, Jiang Liu wrote:
> Commit 9a46ad6d6df3b54 "smp: make smp_call_function_many() use logic
> similar to smp_call_function_single()" has unified the way to handle
> single and multiple cross-CPU function calls. Now only one intterupt

s/intterupt/interrupt/

> is needed for architecture specific code to support generic SMP function
> call interfaces, so kill the redundant single function call interrupt.
> 
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> Cc: Jiri Kosina <trivial@...nel.org>
> Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>

Acked-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>

Do you want me to take this patch through the metag tree for v3.14 or
let it go via another tree with the other patches?

Thanks
James

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ