lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 04 Dec 2013 16:39:43 +0000
From:	Jonathan Austin <jonathan.austin@....com>
To:	Jonathan Austin <jonathan.austin@....com>
CC:	Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>,
	"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: default PHYS_OFFSET if !MMU

Hi all,

On 13/11/13 11:46, Jonathan Austin wrote:
> Hi Ming,
>
> On 13/11/13 11:15, Ming Lei wrote:
>> From: Jonathan Austin <jonathan.austin@....com>
>>
>> Set CONFIG_PAGE_OFFSET as PHYS_OFFSET when !MMU so that
>> we can keep CONFIG_PAGE_OFFSET same with PAGE_OFFSET.
>>
>
> I'm not so sure about this commit message - I don't think
> it makes sense...Should it not be more like:
>
> ------->8-------
> Subject: ARM: set PAGE_OFFSET = PHYS_OFFSET if !MMU
>
> With !MMU we still set PAGE_OFFSET to 0xC0000000, which
> makes little sense and causes a regression on !MMU after
> f6537f2f0eba4eba ("scripts/kallsyms: filter symbols not
> kernel address space")
>
> This patch sets PAGE_OFFSET to PHYS_OFFSET in the !MMU
> case, fixing the regression (Tested on Cortex-R7/Vexpress)
> --------8<---------
>
> Russell: Will you pick this patch up from the list or does
> it need to go in through the patch system?


What's the status of this patch? Shall I put it in the patch system with 
the commit message above? Or is it going via someone else?

Jonny

>
> Jonny
>
>> This patch and patch 2/2 fix regression on !MMU by
>> f6537f2f0eba4eba("scripts/kallsyms: filter symbols not
>> in kernel address space")
>>
>> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Austin <jonathan.austin@....com>
>> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
>> ---
>>    arch/arm/Kconfig |    1 +
>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
>> index 799ef94..db708c4 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
>> @@ -1560,6 +1560,7 @@ endchoice
>>
>>    config PAGE_OFFSET
>>    	hex
>> +	default PHYS_OFFSET if !MMU
>>    	default 0x40000000 if VMSPLIT_1G
>>    	default 0x80000000 if VMSPLIT_2G
>>    	default 0xC0000000
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ