linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 tip/core/locking 0/4] Memory-barrier documentation updates

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131205085146.0370ea2a@gandalf.local.home>
Date:	Thu, 5 Dec 2013 08:51:46 -0500
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	Henrik Austad <henrik@...tad.us>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
	dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, josh@...htriplett.org,
	niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
	dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, darren@...art.com,
	fweisbec@...il.com, sbw@....edu, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 tip/core/locking 0/4] Memory-barrier documentation
 updates

On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 13:28:51 +0100
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
 
> > Just me, or is the 3rd patch missing from lkml?
> 
> It had a Cc: list from hell so vger probably rejected it as spam.
> 

I wish vger wouldn't do that. I wonder how much spam is really flagged
by this one characteristic alone. That is, spam that would have made it
otherwise, but because of the Cc list, it was rejected.

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/