[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52A084EB.5010103@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 21:51:39 +0800
From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
Al Stone <al.stone@...aro.org>, patches@...aro.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC part1 PATCH 5/7] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce arm_core.c and
its related head file
On 2013年12月05日 11:38, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 December 2013, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> +static unsigned int gsi_to_irq(unsigned int gsi)
>> +{
>> + int irq = irq_create_mapping(NULL, gsi);
>> +
>> + return irq;
>> +}
> I think this could use a comment regarding your plans for IRQ domains.
>
> Do you expect that all ACPI systems would have only a single GIC IRQ
> controller and a single domain, or do you plan to add irqdomain code
> later?
we added irqdomain code in the part2 patch set, is that the code ok
with you?
Thanks
Hanjun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists