lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131205091652.0523f2c3@gandalf.local.home>
Date:	Thu, 5 Dec 2013 09:16:52 -0500
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
	Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@...r.at>
Subject: [PATCH RT] cpu hotplug: Document why PREEMPT_RT uses a spinlock

The patch:

    cpu: Make hotplug.lock a "sleeping" spinlock on RT
    
    Tasks can block on hotplug.lock in pin_current_cpu(), but their
    state might be != RUNNING. So the mutex wakeup will set the state
    unconditionally to RUNNING. That might cause spurious unexpected
    wakeups. We could provide a state preserving mutex_lock() function,
    but this is semantically backwards. So instead we convert the
    hotplug.lock() to a spinlock for RT, which has the state preserving
    semantics already.

Fixed a bug where the hotplug lock on PREEMPT_RT can be called after a
task set its state to TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE and before it called
schedule. If the hotplug_lock used a mutex, and there was contention,
the current task's state would be turned to TASK_RUNNABLE and the
schedule call will not sleep. This caused unexpected results.

Although the patch had a description of the change, the code had no
comments about it. This causes confusion to those that review the code,
and as PREEMPT_RT is held in a quilt queue and not git, it's not as easy
to see why a change was made. Even if it was in git, the code should
still have a comment for something as subtle as this.

Document the rational for using a spinlock on PREEMPT_RT in the hotplug
lock code.

Reported-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@...r.at>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>

diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index 063c2bb..c3014f1 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -80,6 +80,14 @@ struct hotplug_pcp {
 	struct completion synced;
 	struct completion unplug_wait;
 #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
+	/*
+	 * Note, on PREEMPT_RT, the hotplug lock must save the state of
+	 * the task, otherwise the mutex will cause the task to fail
+	 * to sleep when required. (Because it's called from migrate_disable())
+	 *
+	 * The spinlock_t on PREEMPT_RT is a mutex that saves the task's
+	 * state.
+	 */
 	spinlock_t lock;
 #else
 	struct mutex mutex;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ