[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <y0meh5rs2eq.fsf@fche.csb>
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 11:11:57 -0500
From: fche@...hat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler)
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>,
Jovi Zhangwei <jovi.zhangwei@...il.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH tip 0/5] tracing filters with BPF
ast wrote:
>>[...]
> Did simple ktap test with 1M alloc_skb/kfree_skb toy test from earlier email:
> trace skb:kfree_skb {
> if (arg2 == 0x100) {
> printf("%x %x\n", arg1, arg2)
> }
> }
> [...]
For reference, you might try putting systemtap into the performance
comparison matrix too:
# stap -e 'probe kernel.trace("kfree_skb") {
if ($location == 0x100 /* || $location == 0x200 etc. */ ) {
printf("%x %x\n", $skb, $location)
}
}'
- FChE
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists