linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] at91: cleanup for 3.14 #1 (aka move to CCF)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52A0AB2E.80504@atmel.com>
Date:	Thu, 5 Dec 2013 17:34:54 +0100
From:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
CC:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, "arm@...nel.org" <arm@...nel.org>,
	"Linux Kernel list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>,
	Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon@...rkiz.com>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] at91: cleanup for 3.14 #1 (aka move to CCF)

On 04/12/2013 22:54, Olof Johansson :
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com> wrote:
>> Arnd, Olof, Kevin,
>>
>> This is the big move of AT91 to Common Clock Framework for 3.14. I collected
>> all the material as a "cleanup" topic so that the CCF can be considered as a
>> base for all our AT91 patches for 3.14.
>> I prefer to have the sama5d3 use of AT91 CCF included into this pull-request
>> so that it can be read as an example and clearly states that it has been tested
>> in real life.
>> We agreed with Mike to send this work upstream through arm-soc so that we will
>> be able to stack other patches for 3.14 on top of that work without having to
>> deal with conflicts.
>>
>> For merging with the "fixes" pull-request that I sent earlier today, I also
>> uploaded a little branch for reference:
>> at91-3.14-next_fixes_cleanup_dt-resolution.
>> In two words, the clock section of the arch/arm/mach-at91/sama5d3.c file
>> has to be deleted.
>>
>> Do not hesitate to ask questions about this material.
>>
>> Thanks, best regards,
>>
>> The following changes since commit 6ce4eac1f600b34f2f7f58f9cd8f0503d79e42ae:
>>
>>    Linux 3.13-rc1 (2013-11-22 11:30:55 -0800)
>>
>> are available in the git repository at:
>>
>>    git://github.com/at91linux/linux-at91.git tags/at91-cleanup
>>
>> for you to fetch changes up to b46e837d8ef1f3c777bbf9513e2cdb5d87d6c374:
>>
>>    ARM: at91/dt: remove old clk material (2013-12-02 15:31:29 +0100)
>
> Thanks, pulled into next/cleanup. use this branch as base for your
> future at91 branches if you need it to avoid conflicts, please.

Yes, sure. I still have to synchronize with Uwe as he is building a 
series for removing timex.h that may conflict with these modifications.

> (I named it at91/sama5-ccf in our tree)

Well, it seems that the at91/sama5-ccf is not aligned with
next/cleanup as of today (94c5216ee93b)

Did I miss something?

Bye,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/