lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 18:50:50 +0000 From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com> To: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com> cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, azurIt <azurit@...ox.sk>, Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@...e.fr>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org> Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] fs: buffer: move allocation failure loop into the allocator On Thu, 5 Dec 2013, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > I could try. But my trial would not figure this out, since my machine has > just 4 cores which normally cannot produce heavy contention. I think that is fine for starters. Once we know what to look for we can find machines to test specific scenarios. > Anyway, could you tell me where I can find your synthetic benchmarks for slab? https://lkml.org/lkml/2009/10/13/459 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists