[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <00000142c4192155-e27322df-ba1a-4af8-98c3-f2b15dd70d13-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 18:50:50 +0000
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, azurIt <azurit@...ox.sk>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@...e.fr>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] fs: buffer: move allocation failure loop into the
allocator
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> I could try. But my trial would not figure this out, since my machine has
> just 4 cores which normally cannot produce heavy contention.
I think that is fine for starters. Once we know what to look for we can
find machines to test specific scenarios.
> Anyway, could you tell me where I can find your synthetic benchmarks for slab?
https://lkml.org/lkml/2009/10/13/459
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists