[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131205190138.GW15492@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 11:01:39 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...nel.org, henrik@...tad.us,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, josh@...htriplett.org,
niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, darren@...art.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, sbw@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 tip/core/locking 0/4] Memory-barrier documentation
updates
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 01:44:06PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 10:18:34 -0800
>
> > The situation that leads me to use a large CC list is when I am doing
> > something that affects all architectures. I could imagine keeping a
> > smallish CC list, then forwarding or bouncing the email to the remaining
> > maintainers Would that work reasonably, or is there some better approach?
>
> Please use linux-arch, that's what that list is for, notifying arch
> maintainers of changes that basically have an impact on every target.
Thank you, I have updated that commit as you suggested.
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists