[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20131206.114602.2053541753179744731.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 11:46:02 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: linux@...ck-us.net
Cc: zwu.kernel@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, wuzhy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 3/6] macvtap: remove the dead branch
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 22:08:20 -0800
> Assigning the function's return value to ret just to ignore it seems
> odd.
>
> Might make sense to change the function type to void.
That's exactly what his very next patch does, undoubtedly the two
patches should be combined into one.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists