linux-kernel - Re: [net-next PATCH 3/6] macvtap: remove the dead branch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131206172931.GA32730@roeck-us.net>
Date:	Fri, 6 Dec 2013 09:29:31 -0800
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	zwu.kernel@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, wuzhy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 3/6] macvtap: remove the dead branch

On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 11:46:02AM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 22:08:20 -0800
> 
> > Assigning the function's return value to ret just to ignore it seems
> > odd.
> > 
> > Might make sense to change the function type to void.
> 
> That's exactly what his very next patch does, undoubtedly the two
> patches should be combined into one.
> 
Yes, I think that would be a good idea.

Thanks,
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/