[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFrcx1khWGXJOyyqOBedyZsmLWYdhmkGsn0FhNt6hwCYhf5qfA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 19:02:02 +0100
From: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...aro.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Patch Tracking <patches@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf: unwinding: use the per-feature check flags
Hi Jiri,
On 9 December 2013 18:17, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 11:17:41AM +0100, Jean Pihet wrote:
>> Use the per-feature check flags for the unwinding feature in order
>> to correctly compile the libunwind and libunwind-debug-frame feature
>> checks.
>>
>> Tested on x86_64, ARMv7 and ARMv8 with and without LIBUNWIND_DIR set
>> in 'make -C tools/perf'
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...aro.org>
>> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
>
> SNIP
>
>> +BUILD = $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o $(OUTPUT)$@ $@.c $(LDFLAGS)
>>
>> ###############################
>>
>> test-all:
>> - $(BUILD) -Werror -fstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -O2 -Werror -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -ldw -lelf -lnuma $(LIBUNWIND_LIBS) -lelf -laudit -I/usr/include/slang -lslang $(shell pkg-config --libs --cflags gtk+-2.0 2>/dev/null) $(FLAGS_PERL_EMBED) $(FLAGS_PYTHON_EMBED) -DPACKAGE='"perf"' -lbfd -ldl
>> + $(BUILD) -Werror -fstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -O2 -Werror -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -ldw -lelf -lnuma -lelf -laudit -I/usr/include/slang -lslang $(shell pkg-config --libs --cflags gtk+-2.0 2>/dev/null) $(FLAGS_PERL_EMBED) $(FLAGS_PYTHON_EMBED) -DPACKAGE='"perf"' -lbfd -ldl
>
> hum, the test-all build command should have every possible flags we use, right?
> including LIBUNWIND_CFLAGS, LIBUNWIND_LDFLAGS
Oh yes you are right. I am overlooked the test-all feature (which
never builds on my modest embedded systems).
$(LIBUNWIND_LIBS) should be replaced by $(LIBUNWIND_CFLAGS)
$(LIBUNWIND_LDFLAGS), is that a reasonable approach?
>
> also, this patch no longer applies on acme's perf/core
I am using a recent mainline (3.12-rc2).
Let me correct the patch on acme's perf/core. Is that OK?
Thx for reviewing!
Jean
>
> jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists