[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQW60hW06sr=ahV6rEMRQ5kA04A_1mUtfZQAra__6ttNxw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 12:47:24 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@...onical.com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI: pcibus address to resource converting take bus
instead of dev
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 12:03:18PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Ugh. Why would we add new functions with "__" prefixes? There are
>> >> only a handful of callers to pcibios_bus_to_resource() and
>> >> pcibios_resource_to_bus(). We can just change them to supply a
>> >> "struct pci_bus *" directly. That's a better match for how the
>> >> hardware works anyway.
>> >
>>
>> Please double check if you are happy with the change.
>> Hope that will not update stable tree maintainer guys.
>
> What do you mean by this?
Do not want to change too much code, to upset stable tree maintainers.
>
> How is this a -stable kernel patch?
We have stable patch that will need use the new function.
[PATCH 2/2] PCI: Only enable realloc auto when root bus has 64bit mmio
Thanks
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists