[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52A62D9D.5080105@tilera.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 15:52:45 -0500
From: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: <akpm@...uxfoundation.org>, <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 35/41] tile: Replace __get_cpu_var uses
On 12/3/2013 6:33 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> __get_cpu_var() is used for multiple purposes in the kernel source. One of
> them is address calculation via the form &__get_cpu_var(x). This calculates
> the address for the instance of the percpu variable of the current processor
> based on an offset.
>
> [...]
>
> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Acked-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>
Except for a comment typo:
> /*
> * Read the set of maskable interrupts.
> - * We avoid the preemption warning here via __this_cpu_ptr since even
> + * We avoid the preemption warning here via raw_cpu_ptr since even
> * if irqs are already enabled, it's harmless to read the wrong cpu's
> * enabled mask.
> */
> #define arch_local_irqs_enabled() \
> - (*__this_cpu_ptr(&interrupts_enabled_mask))
> + raw_cpu_read(interrupts_enabled_mask)
Should be raw_cpu_read() in the comment.
I assume you are planning to submit these through your own tree, not the arch trees?
--
Chris Metcalf, Tilera Corp.
http://www.tilera.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists