linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI: pcibus address to resource converting take bus instead of dev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAErSpo7DPMRBHefLXSvw8v=vdu_qzGDKbbjXtZSF61cA1_padw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 9 Dec 2013 14:06:59 -0700
From:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@...onical.com>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI: pcibus address to resource converting take bus
 instead of dev

On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 12:03:18PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
>>> > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Ugh.  Why would we add new functions with "__" prefixes?  There are
>>> >> only a handful of callers to pcibios_bus_to_resource() and
>>> >> pcibios_resource_to_bus().  We can just change them to supply a
>>> >> "struct pci_bus *" directly.  That's a better match for how the
>>> >> hardware works anyway.
>>> >
>>>
>>> Please double check if you are happy with the change.
>>> Hope that will not update stable tree maintainer guys.
>>
>> What do you mean by this?
>
> Do not want to change too much code, to upset stable tree maintainers.
>
>>
>> How is this a -stable kernel patch?
>
> We have stable patch that will need use the new function.
>
> [PATCH 2/2] PCI: Only enable realloc auto when root bus has 64bit mmio

Let's not get too far ahead of ourselves here.  I don't like this
patch even for upstream, so we don't need to worry about -stable quite
yet.

Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/