[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52A8BAC5.70006@canonical.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 14:19:33 -0500
From: Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@...onical.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
CC: "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: Only enable realloc auto when root bus has 64bit
mmio
On 12/09/2013 03:10 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com> wrote:
>> That doesn't answer my question at all.
>>
>> I understand that this change makes it so Joseph doesn't have to use
>> "pci=realloc=off". But why should auto-reallocation be limited to
>> buses that have resources above 4GB? That doesn't make any sense.
>>
>> We should fix the reallocation code so it can deal with this case. If
>> there's not enough space for everything, obviously we have to leave
>> something unassigned. A ROM BAR is a good candidate for leaving
>> unassigned, because most of the time we can get along without it.
> Yes, that is ideal and not that simple.
> but that would be hard to backport to old kernels.
>
> BTW, Joseph, can you try
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/yinghai/linux-yinghai.git
> for-pci-3.14
> with pci=realloc=on
>
> on that system?
>
> Thanks
>
> Yinghai
I noticed there was some back and forth on this thread. Do you still
want me to test this version, Yinghai?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists