[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131210112257.GJ2208@pompeji.miese-zwerge.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 12:22:57 +0100
From: Jochen Striepe <jochen@...ot.escape.de>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 3.10.5: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks
Hi again,
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 06:54:41AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 02:58:04PM +0100, Jochen Striepe wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:26:14PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > Hmmm... Does the following patch help?
> > [...]
> > > rcu: Kick CPU halfway to RCU CPU stall warning
> >
> > The stall didn't appear at all since my last email, running 3.12.x
> > kernels since release. But I will test your patch later today. I assume
> > applying on top of 3.12.3 is correct?
>
> 3.12.3 should take that patch just fine.
Sorry for the delay. On my copy of 3.12.3, the patch does not apply.
kernel/rcu/ does not exist, and the patch did not apply cleanly on
kernel/rcutree.c: record_gp_stall_check_time() is a little different
from what your patch expects, and I'm not that much into rcu work as
to understand the implications. :)
If you want me to go back to 3.12.0 I can do so, but as the issue
does not reproduce very well I doubt that would help very much.
Ideas? Is there a version of the patch for -stable, or does the
patch conflict with the work done there?
Best greetings,
Jochen.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists