[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52A6FB5C.7010706@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 12:30:36 +0100
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...aro.org>
Subject: [question] sched: idle_avg and migration latency
Hi All,
I am trying to understand how is computed the idle_avg and how it is
used regarding the migration latency.
1. What is the sysctl_sched_migration_cost value ? It is initialized to
500000UL. Is it an arbitrarily chosen value ? Could it change depending
on the hardware performances ?
2. The idle_balance function checks:
if (this_rq->avg_idle < sysctl_sched_migration_cost)
return 0;
IIUC, it is not worth to migrate a task to this cpu as we expect to run
another task before we can pull a task to the current cpu, right ?
Then if there is no task to balance we will enter idle, thus we
initialize the idle_stamp to the current clock.
When another task is woken up with the ttwu_do_wakeup, the duration of
the idle time is computed in there:
if (rq->idle_stamp) {
u64 delta = rq_clock(rq) - rq->idle_stamp;
u64 max = 2*sysctl_sched_migration_cost;
if (delta > max)
rq->avg_idle = max;
else
update_avg(&rq->avg_idle, delta);
rq->idle_stamp = 0;
}
Why is the 'delta' leveraged by 'max' ?
3. And finally the function update_avg does:
s64 diff = sample - *avg;
*avg += diff >> 3;
Why is diff >> 3 used instead of the number of values ?
Thanks in advance for any answers
-- Daniel
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists